Recent flooding in Kenya in
April 2013 led to 62 deaths and almost 90,000 displaced people. Heavy rains during the March rainy season resulted in many riparian flooding events,
washing away villages and agriculture along many of Kenya's waterways. These events
have led to substantial pressure on the Kenyan government to improve its response to such flooding events and flood control.
Disaster aid during the April 2013 floods, from the Facebook page of the Kenya Red Cross Society. |
These most recent floods are
part of a string of large floods in the past 20 years. The 1997/1998
floods affected almost 1 million people, with economic costs of $0.8 to 1.2 billion. Another 2006 event affected over 723,000 Kenyans. In a recent survey on flooding events in Kenya, 96% of respondents said that floods have become more frequent or intense over the past 20 years. Flash floods occur in both rural and urban areas, most commonly in river valleys, marshes, lakeshores, and along the coasts, during either the short and long rains. High vulnerability to floods can be exacerbated by high poverty, poor land use patterns (such as deforestation, agriculture, and settling along river banks), low education and literacy, and low levels of infrastructure.
Floods can devastate both local and national economies. Even in the absence of climate change, population and economic growth (particularly in riparian areas) will increase the costs of flooding events by a factor of 5 by 2030. Climate change will only compound these costs: because flood damage costs rise very sharply with flood depth and strength, a higher frequency and intensity of flooding events with climate change will drastically increase these costs. Costs include mortality, damage to infrastructure (roads, buildings, and communications), public health, loss of crops, as well as undocumented effects on rural populations and the non-formal economy. Costs can also include ecological damage: coral reefs in Mombasa, a popular coastal tourist destination, were highly damaged by the 1997/1998 floods, with 50% of coral reefs in nearby Malindi killed by light limitation arising from sediment deposition, hurting the tourism in this region.
A coral reef on the Kenyan coast. Image from the Smooth Guide to the Kenya Coast. |
The Kenyan government's response to flooding events has focused on post-flooding relief, as well as prevention of future flood damage. Post- flooding relief has been the government's main focus, but such relief efforts have been poorly coordinated and unnecessarily expensive, likely due to the lack of a disaster management policy, as well as the government's lack of response to early warnings. Governmental post-flood efforts have focused on distributing food, but other critical components of the response, such as healthcare, have been neglected due to lack of funds, lack of roads, and absence of infrastructure in rural areas. Governmental efforts to prevent and control flooding via dam construction have also suffered from inadequacies. A recent United Nations Report highlighted that poorly-designed dams in some regions of Kenya have led to seepage and backflows of water. Many of these dams are more than 20 years old and must be repaired or replaced soon.
In an effort to address shortcomings with preventing, controlling, and responding to flooding, in April 2013, the Kenyan government announced the establishment of a national disaster management authority. This program will help coordinate multiple institutions' disaster prevention and response, hopefully leading to a more efficient, effective, and integrated disaster management system. In addition, this program will develop a five-year plan to build dykes and dams to curb flooding. In addition to flood relief and prevention, this group will likely focus on improving both forecasting of flood events, as well as improving warning systems for communities in flood areas.
Flooding in Bunyala after a dam failed; many of the dams in this region are quite old, some up to 40 years. Image from IRIN. |
While floods in Kenya are a substantial problem, and will likely only increase in frequency, intensity, and cost in the future, both governmental and local efforts to mitigate and prevent future damage will likely help improve flood control and response. While this post has outlined how floods can be a disastrous problem in Kenya, my next post will discuss how increased river flow can also be beneficial: I will discuss how increased river flow arising from increased precipitation might help Kenya's energy sector.
Is land-use change playing a role in the ecological impacts, or are flood the primary mechanism of enhanced sediment transport? Perhaps both? This post reminds me that issue of decaying dam infrastructure is also faced here in the United States; as jurisdiction plays a role in available repair funds and many old dams are up for (FERC) permit renewal, which could easily be challenged due to demonstrated impacts on aquatic and ecological habitats.
ReplyDeleteSimilarly to Garrett's comment, I wonder if the way in which the rural people of Kenya make a living and live, via agriculture and grazing of their animals, plays a large part in the increased flood risk to this region. If so, this is a large predicament since this is the way rural villages survive. Also, often times these small villages decline or even resent governmental help which does not help the overall flooding situation.
ReplyDeleteIn regards to the governmental management practices, it seems counterproductive to be sending the majority of funds on post flooding actions rather than spending more money on projects to mitigate and reduce the risk of flooding to the region.